Category Archives: Uncategorized

Which RE/ES Film To Show?

Hi All,

As you may have seen, Ariel and I are organising a British Fetish Film Festival: http://www.britishfetishfilmfestival.co.uk.
We’ve got the “zeroth” festival coming up in a couple of weeks, a dry run with a bunch of other producers and crew.

I’ve been looking at so many other people’s films in the run up to this event that I’ve lost all shreds of objectivity about our own work.

So I thought I’d ask you which Restrained Elegance/Elegance Studios film we should show. The audience is kinky, but not necessarily into exactly the same things as we are. If you had to pick an RE film for that sort of crowd, which one would you show?
(N.B. we don’t have to send the same film to the “real” festival- that’ll be a different poll later in the year!)

Here’s a list of ones I was considering. My criteria were that it shouldn’t be too old (although the action may have been hot, I want something that is also representative of what we’re doing technically now), it should have a good story with some distinct characters in it, it should move at a good clip, and ideally should have been highly rated by RE members.

If you think I’ve missed out the perfect one to send, do post and let me know!

Cheers, Hywel.

[cardoza_wp_poll id=4]

Models and Prejudice

Hi All,

I’m afraid I’m writing this blog post because I’m cross. I’m cross because of a particular prejudice I observe entrenched deep in people’s attitudes which I see all too often in the attitudes people (men and women) have about nude models.

I encounter this second-hand because I’m married to a nude model, and work with and know a lot of other models.

It is time society grew up and allowed everyone to have a sexual identity without prejudicial judgements being made about that person in other spheres of life. The prejudice exists in many forms, but the one against women seems to be particularly vicious and widespread.

The most pernicious manifestation is that a woman displaying a sexual identity (either her own, or one of a character she is portraying in photos/movies) is “besmirched”, forever after damaged goods who should be ashamed of herself for what she’s done and who isn’t really fit to exist in “decent” society thereafter.

Seriously, FUCK THAT.

I hear the echoes of this attitude endlessly in reported conversations with photographers, friends, family and worst of all in the models’ own attitudes to some of their work, worrying that it has made them “dirty” and not worthy of having a happy and normal family life. No-one should be made to feel that way about themselves.

Sex and sexuality is a lovely facet of human existence. Sex is natural. 99%+ of us are the product of a sexual union between two parents who had sex to have us.

Our bodies have evolved around sex, and some of these attitudes probably stem from our “nature red in tooth and claw” history where wars were fought for control of females of reproductive age. We pay lip service to sexual equality, but there’s a deep reservoir of cultural prejudice to drain before we really mean it.

We have free will, we can think, and we can improve our moral codes to be fair. We’ve abolished slavery throughout most of the world, we’ve tackled the most egregious sexual and racial discrimination so at least the law codifies freedom rather than inequality.

It is time we tackled the “madonna or whore” prejudice, too.

Manifestation 1: No sluts for adverts
There is nothing about advertising shampoo, digestive biscuits, sofas, dresses or shoes that requires that the person so doing be celibate. Many adults who use those products will have sex. Sometimes even on the sofa or after a night out wearing the dress and shoes. So why is the girl who appears in the adverts not also allowed to appear nude for other jobs? The skills needed to make yourself look great are highly transferrable between adverts and nude modelling.

Why should this embarrass the company who makes digestive biscuits? It is hypocrisy- these companies all use pretty young women of fertile age to advertise their products, so what’s wrong with said women also modelling nude or in bondage or stripping off some sexy lingerie or whatever else she wants to do? You don’t see digestive biscuits advertised by and for nuns and eunuchs only, do you? This prejudice needs to be challenged.

Manifestation 2: Level Pushing
One might have imagined that the modelling industry would be better than society in general. After all, half the people involved are the models themselves. One might think that photographers would soon learn that you can’t make value judgements about people depending on how naked they get; models who show more skin are as nice and as nasty, on average, as anyone else. Most professionals quickly figure that out. But not all photographers do.

Instead we get a the “level pushing slut shaming and defilement” ritual which seems to be the main reason some shit-bags do photography in the first place. They always seem to have tracked down the most explicit photos showing the maximum amount of detail of a girl’s genitals. They always push models to shoot more explicit work than they advertise as being happy with, then judge them as a dirty slut if they do (and tell everyone else about it. Ohh, you know Model Mary Mary? Ooooh, she worked to open leg you know, oooh, look at these I’ve printed out…)

It’s utterly reprehensible and pathetic at the same time. If these people genuinely wanted to shoot good work of a certain level of explicitness, they’d book one of the many models who are delighted to do that. They wouldn’t harass girls who clearly DON’T want to shoot work like that, so they can feel a bit like they’ve had sex with her, boast about it, and claim that it wasn’t anything to do with them as secretly the girl was a slut all along so she deserves it. It says nothing at all about the model. It speaks volumes about the arsehole pushing the levels, though.

Manifestation 3: I can’t tell my family
I’m very sad that lots of people who do beautiful work including a sexual element are too terrified of the revelation to tell anyone they know in “normal” life about it. This affects website producers, photographers and models too.

People shouldn’t have to fear being ostracised because they have a sexual identity or because they’re sufficiently intelligent and talented to be able to portray characters with a sexual identity on film.

I know I’m lucky. I was brought up in a very liberal, atheist, secular, non-sexist, scientific and loving family, in a particularly liberal time. My Mum worked in technical industries, was sufficiently bolshy to challenge her employer when she was given inadequately challenging work to do, got her solo pilot’s licence, read Pure Maths at University as a mature student for a challenge, and became a computer program troubleshooter. My Dad is equally accomplished in his fields too. The idea that there was anything that my Mum shouldn’t be allowed to do because she was a woman never occurred to me.

(Parenthetically, I think it is only OK to run a website portraying female submissive bondage because I live in a society where bondage can just be a sexual game for fun, not a daily fact of life enshrined in law for more than 50% of the population).

I’ve never been ostracised or had any worry that I would be and as a result I’ve been able to be completely open about what I do. And because I live in a nice intelligensia liberal bubble, I’ve never encountered a bad reaction that lasted much past the first enthusiastic conversation and proudly showing off some of my work.

Everyone should be able to ask that amount of respect from their friends, families and employers- whatever field they work in. It is time people got over the attitude that sex is sinful. Disowning one of your children because they are gay is starting to be seen as despicable. Disowning them or judging them because they are a nude model should be, too. It is a failure of the prejudiced people, not of the model.

I think it is especially tricky for models because I have observed that many of them have a fluid, hazy self-image. This was the biggest surprise to me about the industry. I assumed models would have to be really confident, especially about their looks. I’m sure some are, but a more common pattern seems to be that their self-image is reliant upon and largely defined by the opinions of others.

I conjecture that this may be an asset in the job for models (and actors, too). Maybe it is easier to step into character for a wide variety of roles if you aren’t fighting a very strong internal image of yourself? But it also means that the disapproval of others can be even more devastating than usual.

Perhaps this is one reason why not so many models boldly proclaim their identity and occupation as a skilled and demanding and artistic job, something of which one should be proud?

Manifestation 4: New boyfriend
Oh, there’s a whole blog post about models and boyfriends to be done. I want to highlight one particular instinct which manifests in a nice way, a nasty way and a very nasty way.

The Nice Way
To an outsider, the modelling industry seems pretty scary. If you’ve never been to a nude photoshoot, it is easy for the imagination to run riot and imagine orgies of sex, drugs and rock-n-roll. As with all jobs, the reality is very different, and very mundane. Photographers worry about lights, f-stops, shutter speeds, ISO, white balance, composition, making sure the model is safe, warm enough… one’s mind is entirely too occupied to get turned on, despite the presence of a naked girl. It soon becomes unremarkable. And the model is likewise concerned with where the key light is, which way to turn her body, how much to arch her back, pointing her toes, making nice shapes, relaxing her hands, the expression on her face, what the character in the story might be doing, where the camera is, holding the pose long enough to get the shot, then knowing where she is going to go next.

You couldn’t imagine a less sexy way to look at naked women. The eroticism of the final product is the result of an awful lot of fiddly detail work, not a crime of passion. It is like sewing a dress for a celebrity to wear on the red carpet to the Oscars. The end result is a very glamourous thing, but I assure you that the person sewing the zip in in a workshop is not experiencing the glamour of the ceremony while they do it.

It is natural to be interested, concerned and possibly a bit intimidated if you suddenly start going out with someone in the industry. In the same was it is natural to be interested and concerned if you start going out with someone who works in a nuclear power plant. But you’ll soon learn that they don’t come home radioactive. And models don’t come home having had a sexual experience.

Nice boyfriends soon learn this.

The Nasty Way
The nasty way is to bag yourself a model, then “rescue” her from that life so she can be exclusively yours. Which she likely would have been anyway- models don’t seem to be any more prone to cheating than the general population, and the good ones are too busy driving all over the country modelling to cheat on you even if they have the inclination.

Nasty boyfriends flatter themselves how big a man they are for acquiring such a high-status bit of arm candy, then immediately get wildly jealous and start laying out a hundred and one terms and conditions designed to make it impossible for her to continue in the career which made her an attractive catch in the first place. Hypocrites; these are the ones who would probably cheat given a snifter of a chance and can’t imagine that anyone wouldn’t. So the only safe place for the little woman is locked in the house.

The Really Nasty Way
The really nasty way is to be titillated by the idea of winning a model as a bit of status symbol arm candy, then pimp her out and push her to do harder and harder scenes so you can spend her money, whilst telling her that she’s lucky to have you, most men wouldn’t put up with what she does for a living. The more you can force her to feel degraded, the more you can coerce her to do, the worse she will feel about herself, and the less chance she’ll realise you are an abusive c*nt and dump your sorry arse.

I’ve met this particular model boyfriend so often he has a name: TMB (Typical Model Boyfriend). He’s a photographer (part time) and her manager, and he can get you into Mayfair or the Yorkshire Evening Post Page Three, he shows up to shoots and pesters the photographer, shouts pose instructions at the models, perves over any other models, disrupts the shoot with loud phone calls to other jobs, writes the models’ emails for her (and signs it with a sexual innuendo and a kiss-kiss). I’ve met him in several physical bodies but it is the same person inside, I swear it.

Manifestation 5: I’m not good enough, I feel dirty
Putting to one side my conjecture that models may, as a group, be more than usually sensitive to the opinions of others for their own sense of self-worth, no-one likes to be disapproved of or castigated.

The net result of the general climate of “she asked for it”, “slut shaming”, “oooh, she works to open leg”, “Can’t advertise smarties because you once showed a nipple” is that some models start to feel that they are doing something shameful.

This is a tricky thing, because they are constantly getting these little needling inputs saying that they ARE doing something shameful. It is hard to stay proud and believing that you are doing beautiful nude work in the face of all this.

And that’s the very worst thing. I’ve heard models whose body of artistic work constitutes a absolute JEWEL of which our culture should be rightly proud worrying that they feel dirty, that they don’t know if they even deserve a “nice” boyfriend (i.e. non-abusive non-arsehole) and whether they are fit to be a mother and raise children or do a “normal” job ever again.

YES, YOU ARE FIT TO DO WHATEVER YOU WANT.

Be a good person, work hard, be honest and trustworthy, be an independent woman running her own business, create great art, have fun doing it, and fight the stereotypes and prejudices that say you can’t.

My attitude is to be proud about what I do, be proud of it, let people see that I am, and challenge their prejudices. I hope I’d have the courage to stick to that if the heat ever really turned on me, like it did on some of my friends when the tabloids got involved.

I hope models can too and that by doing so we can help break down the prejudices.

A vast number of people consume erotica and porn.

It is only OK to do so if you treat the people who make it and appear in it with respect and let them feel good about the work they’ve done for you to enjoy.

What I’ve Been Up To

As always my blog post is starting with a tired apology; I’m not a good blogger.  All I can say in my defence is that as a model, I’m rather assiduous and prolific.  I wish those words could be used to describe my blogging, but at least I have insight into my condition and I know that they really, really can’t be.

Nevertheless, I’ve been being busy and useful elsewhere, and this is what I’ve been up to;-

Lots and lots and LOTS of modelling. I’ve been in Scotland, Belgium, Holland, Portugal and all OVER England since I last blogged.  Lots of the work has been of a non-kink sort but in the bondage genre I’ve worked for Chimera PetandPonygirls Bondage Chronicles Bondage Bob Jack Bond Limited Audience and, naturally, Restrained Elegance That’s only the ones I could think of off the top of my head by the way, I’m sure there were lots more than that but my diary’s on another floor of the house so I can’t be bothered to fetch it (bad blogger, you see)

For fans of spanking, I’ve also been busily shooting with all the best producers to make sure that the supply of ghastly Amelia’s wickedness doesn’t dry up.  Check out Spanked in Uniform SpankingSarah (who has the best picture of me ever on her masthead) www.northernspanking.com and Dreams of Spanking for lots of lovely updates with me in them.  Yep.

And whilst I’ve been doing all these shoots, I’ve also been finding my feet as a rigger.  Until last year, I’d only rigged for Restrained Elegance, and hadn’t really regarded myself as a rigger at all – just a model who’d picked up enough knowledge to help out when no one else was around to do the rope work.  But then, a couple of studio owners who were aware of my bondage work asked me to come and do a bit of self bondage for some of the photographers who used their studios regularly and were interested in shooting fetish images.  That led to my actually teaching a couple of interested photographers the basics of western rope bondage, and I’ve gradually found myself adding bundles of rope into my modelling bags on more and more occasions.

Finally, when I was booked by a superb photographer Carl Grim for a full day of bondage rigging/modelling and I decided it was time to actually buy my own rope. This shows just how horrifically spoilt one can become as a model – I’m sure that for most people who want to learn rigging for photography, they have to start by buying their own rope, then pay to get some tuition, then do lots of unpaid practicing and then finally, maybe, get paid for their skill.  Naughty, lucky me, eventually buying some rope of my own made me feel that now I could maybe start calling myself a rigger in my own head.

A note of caution; I know most people reading this won’t jump to conclusions, but please please, to those people who think this is a good opportunity to ask me to be their Domme, I’m still not dominant.  And in all honesty, I do find that repeated requests along these lines feel a bit bullying.  Sort of the same as being gay and being continually pestered by people who know you to ‘just have a go at heterosexuality’, and not to be such a stick-in-the-mud because you ‘can’t know what you’re into until you try it’.  I’m not a Domme, just a rather tall sub with a fantastic new collection of gorgeous un-dyed cotton rope which I cut into lengths myself, all giddy with the freedom of choosing lengths that were convenient for me rather than for someone else’s rigging style.

Anyway, so the Carl Grim shoot was fantastic fun for me; the responsibility of tying up a model who hadn’t done much in the way of fetish work before weighed quite heavily on me but both she and Carl Grim were so energetic, thoughtful and talented that I got happily swept along with the whole thing and these pictures are the result;-

And I love them love them love them.  Thanks to Kayleigh and Carl for such a lovely day, which made me feel brave and hopeful about doing more of this in 2013.

And the very next week, I had the chance to try out my ropes again, this time as a result of the wonderfully experimental Pandora Blake who booked me for a joyous, 2 day shoot for Dreams of Spanking with Caroline Grey (yes, I loved her so much I’ll go all hyperbolic if I try to count the ways) and my own lovely BDM Hywel Phillips .  Pandora had wanted to shoot a male bondage photoset and had booked male model Will Savage (can’t find a link for him, if you have one let me know and I’ll credit him properly).  I was kind of nervous about tying up a man for the first time because the bondage I’m used to doing for Restrained Elegance relies a lot upon the models’ having a fair amount of flexibility, especially in the shoulders.  Indeed, it proved fairly challenging; positions that are sustainable for many female models proved painful for Will and it forced me to tie faster than I normally do.  The results, however, are beautiful and I’ll most certainly hope to tie men up again in the future – I’m sure that if I think it through carefully I can find ties that will be comfortable for even the most musclebound chaps.  Anyway, here’s a picture, courtesy of Dreams of Spanking and shot by Hywel .
I’ve got more rigging in my future and I’m very excited about it; modelling is my first love but I’m hoping that in 2013, ropework will be something I also concentrate at getting better at.  We’ve got a lot more shoots for Restrained Elegance planned over the next few months, and I’m going to see if I can do ropework that improves upon these examples;-
I’ve been so keen on my whole new rigging life, I’ve created a pictures-only blog here;-
I know that I need to be sensible about this venture; as a model its hard to injure people but as a rigger I need to take on responsibility for other peoples’ safety and I want to take that seriously.  Modelling feels like a wonderful giddy, childish pursuit in contrast, which is making me love it even more than usual.
Thanks as always for reading my blog posts, I appreciate it very much.
And OMG, hysterical news flash, I’ve been invited to Fetishcon in Tampa this year! Do get in touch if you’ll be there too; I’m a bit incoherent with excitement about it all and can’t find a normal way to finish this sentence so……
Best wishes and Happy Easter everyone,
A/a

The Hobbit: the future of cinema?

Peter Jackson has followed up his Lord of the Rings trilogy with the first in The Hobbit Triology (I kid you not. It will actually be quicker to read the book than watch the films).

I watched it at 24 fps in 2D and thought it was over-long in places, beautiful in others. I thought the riddle scene was absolutely stunning- not visually (although it was very well done visually) nor because of the CGI on gollum (which was awesome CGI) but because of the performances of Martin Freeman and Andy Serkis. The achievement of the film to my eyes was translating that excellent performance by a live actor to a CGI motion captured bunch of pixels. I enjoyed it.

Then I went back and watched it in HFR 3D. When the film opened, there was a ripple of uneasy laughter in the theatre because the HFR initially looked speeded up. Ian Holm’s Bilbo looked like the 1970’s Benny Hill show sped-up chase sequences. Still, bearing in mind Peter Jackson’s exhortation that it would take 20 minutes or so to “tune in” visually, I stuck with it.

Unfortunately although the sped-up effect did diminish, it never went away for me and some of the later action and chase sequences still looked like the Benny Hill show.

Worse, I just couldn’t get away from the ghastly impression that I was watching the behind-the-scenes video of the film, rather than the film itself. You know how you look at the behind-the-scenes footage, and it looks crap, like a bunch of actors dressed in silly costumes and wigs jumping around a set? And when you see the final movie footage, the magic has happened and it looks like Middle Earth?

The magic never happened for me.

Sure, a few shots looked much better in 3D HFR, having looked slow and contrived in 2D 24 fps (I’m guessing those were compromised by them shooting for the 3D HFR version primarily and editing accordingly). But the movie as a whole? I couldn’t get over how bad it looked.

I don’t know how much of it is my conditioned expectations. I could never get away from the VERY STRONG visual impression that I was looking at Sir Ian McKellen, an actor, dressed in a straggly wig, wearing contact lenses (I swear I could see them in some shots) and a slightly grubby woollen costume running around various film sets and the mountains of New Zealand.

In 24 fps 2D, I saw Gandalf the Grey striding around Middle Earth.

Maybe the problem for me is the claimed strength of 48 fps- that it looks more real. So much more real that it looks like what it is, actors, sets and CGI, rather than what our imagination wants to be there to fill in the gaps. Maybe it is the very lack of visual information that helps construct the dream-like world of the movies.

Add to that the inevitable headache because I like to lean my head just a little to the side when I watch films, it turns out. Just enough to force me to sit bolt upright and consciously stop myself from doing it, and when I relax a bit, the headache starts to lurk.

Whatever, neither 3D nor HFR are for me. I hope at least some film-makers continue to shoot in pure 24 fps 2D without compromising to simultaneously shoot 3D HFR. And I have to tell film-makers planning on a pure 3D or HFR release that I’m unlikely to go see your film.

Is this the future of cinema? Not for me. Maybe it is just associations from having watched TV at 50i all my life: maybe even higher frame rates (120 fps?) would look like something else entirely. Maybe it was the interaction with 3D, which I dislike. Maybe I’m a luddite complaining about the advent of sound, colour, widescreen, or noir lighting? (I quite like the right movie in black and white, silent, 4:3 and film noir). Or maybe I’m complaining about insane shaky-cam, the over the top teal and orange effect and other effects which I think will date the films very badly and be relegated to the “special choice” locker. 3D HFR though I think should be consigned to the “never again” locker.

New sites: stills and video of every update?

Hi All,

We’re launching two new/relaunched sites next year:

Silksoles.com Gorgeous girls getting naked and barefoot. Sexy stripteases and playful fun feeling, with a focus on the soles of the feet because that’s what I like 🙂

NudeInMetal.com Girls doing day-to-day tasks nude in metal bondage. In the world of the website, being a Nude-In-Metal girl is a lifestyle choice, something a lot of pretty girls decide to do. Some love it so much they do it 24/7, others enjoy it for sexy occasions. It’s a development of the “Restrained Elegance Days” video series from RE.

We’ve been shooting updates for them since the summer and we’ve had GREAT fun doing it. It’s very sexy and we find it very energising, it has already generated loads of new ideas for RE as we’ve done them. I’ll be publishing lots of teaser sets, videos and examples as soon as I have hosting for the sites and asking you all for input.

I have one big question already which I’d like all you folk out there to help me with:
Would you prefer to see stills and videos of everything? Or should we concentrate on ultimate quality even if that means sometimes doing one or the other?

Thus far, we’ve shot stills and video for each storyline/update for the new sites. For stuff shot in summer daylight, this was fine. But as winter draws in doing it in the studio is more of a challenge than I was expecting.

We can’t use stills lights for video. I like working with studio flash, and you can’t do that at 25 frames per second for video.

We can use video lights for stills but with our current equipment I’m not happy with the quality and consistency of the full-sized stills. Video is shot at 1/50th of a second, on a tripod, and motion blur of the subject is a natural part of that. To get sharp stills we need to be at 1/250th of a second, which means five times as much light as we need for video! That’s a Hollywood lighting truck plus generator truck to get that much continuous light on set. There’s just not the studio room, the electric power or the budget to do it.

It isn’t that the photos suck under video lights. They’re atmospheric and detailed at normal web/full HD size and at least as good as most websites produce.

But I see them at 100% zoom in at 17 or 31 megapixels. If we do full-sized JPEG versions for the new sites, you’ll be able to see them that way too. This is where the lack of critical sharpness caused by camera shake, subject movement, sensor noise, shallow depth of field and lens limitations shows up. It troubles me.

To deliver a stills set 31-megapixel maximum RE quality we have to relight the set with studio flash half way through everything we shoot for the new sites. We run into problems of physical space in the locations (although at least we don’t need a generator truck). It’s slow and the context switching is a downer on shoot days.

What is the “value proposition” for you as enthusiasts and future members?

For RE, we made the policy decision years ago that we’d shoot EITHER stills or video for a given idea, not both, because we were aiming for quality, quality, quality. We can go this route for the new sites too. You’d get either stills of a set, or video-plus-framegrab, but not both.

Or we can shoot stills and video for every update, but accept that the quality of the full-sized still images may not always be up to RE standards. Does that matter to you? Do we even need the full-sized images or are full-HD JPEGs enough? Most sites best resolution is only the same as our “web sized” ones anyway!

Actually even our video framegrabs are better than most website’s stills. Good enough for the cover of Vogue, literally. They’re captured from a RED digital cine camera in RAW with a higher resolution sensor than a lot of stills cameras. Even if we don’t have the dedicated stills, we’ll get great frame grabs from each video, but it is more limited than shooting dedicated stills (e.g. they’ll mostly be in landscape format).

If we shoot stills with full-size RE quality stills, we might not have time to get a video of it as well. Or if we do, we’ll end up shooting half as many updates so you’d probably get a stills set OR a video each week, rather than one of each as we are currently planning.

Which would you prefer?

1) Dedicated stills and video of every update (no full sized JPEGs)
2) Dedicated stills and video of every update (with full sized JPEGs but accepting they’ll be lower quality)
3) It is fine to shoot either stills or video, not both, for ultimate quality
4) Dedicated stills and video of ultimate quality for every update, but half as many updates

Cheers, Hywel.

Here’s a few images to illustrate the quality differences.

Kate B for Silk Soles

This is a still shot under video lights, at normal web size. It is possibly a tiny bit soft, but overall I think it looks pretty good

Kate B Silk Soles

This is the same shot at 100%. Now you can see the limitations of the noise from shooting under video lights, and the limitations of the lens wide open. I don’t think this holds up to an RE still captured with studio flash.

Kate B Silk Soles

A framegrab from the video, shot on the RED. (I didn’t have an exactly comparable frame). You can see there’s some blur from Kate’s movement, and the grade is different, but overall I think the level of detail and sharpness is acceptable. I’m not sure the stills add all that much to the set overall.

Kate B RE full quality still

A full sized shot of Kate in the same studio, but using studio flash and the full “RE quality procedure”. This is from an RE stills set, we didn’t shoot a video of it as well.

Please let us know what you’d like the best:

[cardoza_wp_poll id=1]